🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.